Future of Ethereum and Crypto with Crypt0 and Ran NeuNer

Boxmining avatar Boxmining
5.5K views 244

Description

What's next for Ethereum 2.0, Blockchains LLC, future of the ecosystem and more. Spontaneous live stream during Ethereum Devcon 4 with Crypt0 and Ran NeuNer. *This was originally streamed on Crypt0's ...

AI Analysis

This video, recorded live during Ethereum Devcon 4, features a candid discussion between Omar (Crypt0), Ran NeuNer (CNBC), and Michael Gu (Boxmining). The conversation delves into the evolving crypto ecosystem, the future of Ethereum, and the broader challenges and opportunities facing the industry during a bear market. It provides a raw, behind-the-scenes look at the perspectives of prominent figures in the space, highlighting the shift from speculative hype to genuine building and adoption.

Here’s a breakdown of the key topics and insights shared:

* Devcon 4 and the Evolving Crypto Landscape:
* Devcon 4 is highlighted as a unique conference focused on "real builders" and technical development, rather than the "fluff" and "ICO shills" seen at other events.
* The bear market is viewed positively, as it's "shaking out the riffraff" and forcing projects to focus on substance over hype. The people remaining are seen as high-intellect individuals working collaboratively on mass adoption solutions.
* There's a strong emphasis on building basic, necessary infrastructure for on-ramps and off-ramps, things people didn't even realize were needed.

* Skepticism Towards the "Blockchain City" Project (Blockchains LLC):
* The highly publicized "Blockchain City" project by Blockchains LLC is met with significant skepticism. The grand ideas, like 3D printing and airports on the blockchain, are deemed "too much" and "far-fetched."
* It’s suggested that the project is a "lethal combination of marijuana, mushrooms, and money" due to its unrealistic scope and massive marketing spend (hundreds of thousands of dollars on events and advertising).
The concept of building an entire city on blockchain is rejected; instead, it's believed only certain aspects within* a city might benefit from blockchain technology.
* Despite the skepticism, Jeffrey Burns (from Blockchains LLC) is acknowledged as a "hero" for his legal fight against the IRS in the Coinbase case, standing up for individual rights in the crypto space.
* The overall sentiment is that the project feels like a 2017 ICO, promising the world without substantial execution, and having a very low chance of success (around 5%).

* The Demise of ICOs and the Rise of STOs:
* The era of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) is declared "over," with projects no longer able to raise tens of millions of dollars easily. This is seen as a positive development, bringing an end to the "scams" and "bullshit."
* Developers are now compelled to think like entrepreneurs, bootstrapping and growing protocols with significantly less funding (e.g., $5 million instead of $30 million).
* The focus is shifting towards Security Token Offerings (STOs), which are viewed as a more credible and regulated way to raise capital.
* STOs are exciting because they can put traditional financial instruments onto the blockchain, and even create new, previously impossible instruments. An example given is a shipping company raising funds by offering real-time dividends based on nautical miles and weight, verifiable via smart contracts and the ship's navigation system, something not possible in traditional finance due to a lack of trust.

* Embracing Failure and Experimentation:
* A key insight is the tension between investors, who seek safety and high returns, and developers, who need to take risks and fail to innovate.
* Failure is framed not as a negative but as a necessary part of exploring "uncharted territory" and finding revolutionary breakthroughs. It means you've ventured where no one else has.
* CryptoKitties, despite being criticized as a pyramid scheme, is cited as a successful experiment. It not only became a popular game but also pioneered the ERC-721 standard, creating a new asset class of digital collectibles and demonstrating a real-world use case for non-fungible tokens.

* Institutional Adoption and Real-World Use Cases:
* While there's a lot of talk about institutions, many big family offices are already entering the space.
* Platforms like BAKKT are good "on-ramps" but won't cause an immediate flood of institutional money. Existing products like Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust already offer avenues for institutions.
True institutional adoption requires not just on-ramps and off-ramps (custodians, regulated exchanges) and clear legislation, but most importantly, mass adoption* of blockchain technology by everyday people.
* Pension fund managers won't invest in "utility tokens" that offer no rights, no company obligations, and don't even fully work on the network. The industry needs to "get our shit together" with functional, valuable products.

* Crypto's Three Main Verticals:
* Global Transfer of Value / Store of Value: This vertical includes Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, XRP, and others, addressing the need for value transfer independent of government control (e.g., in hyperinflationary economies like Venezuela or for avoiding capital controls in China).
* Utility Tokens / dApp Use Cases: This involves applications and decentralized applications built on blockchains, with their own specific tokens (though the term "utility token" might evolve).
* Security Token Offerings (STOs): This vertical focuses on porting the traditional financial system onto the blockchain and creating innovative new financial instruments that leverage blockchain's trustless nature.

* Coin-Specific Outlooks (Yes/No for 3-Year Survival):
* Bitcoin (BTC): Yes. Its core value lies in being a simple, immutable accounting layer and a store of value with a fixed supply of 21 million. While its decentralization can slow progress (e.g., smart contracts), this also enhances its security as a store of value. Lightning Network is seen as addressing its speed and cost limitations.
* Ethereum (ETH): Yes. It's the "smart contract leader." Vitalik Buterin's role as a "central figure" is seen as an asset, providing a clear vision and roadmap that drives progress, unlike Bitcoin's slower, more decentralized governance. The move to Proof of Stake (Casper/Ganser) is a massive, ambitious change.
* Litecoin (LTC): Maybe/Yes. It benefits from a strong community and acts as a "testnet" for Bitcoin features (like SegWit or atomic swaps) before they are implemented on Bitcoin. Its long-term value as just a testnet is questioned, but its community and Charlie Lee's efforts are noted.
* EOS: Yes. EOS represents a "balance point" where not everything requires the most extreme level of decentralization. Despite acknowledged governance issues and a divided community, it's considered a valid middle-ground approach.
* XRP (Ripple): No for XRP as a currency/store of value. Ripple the company is praised for challenging SWIFT in cross-border payments. However, XRP itself is criticized because it can be "frozen" and is not truly decentralized (though decentralization efforts are being pushed). It's argued that XRP as a transfer mechanism is "pointless" when XCurrent (Ripple's message-based system) is often preferred, and that a simple US dollar message via traditional means achieves the same goal without the need for a token that behaves like a centralized banking instrument.
* Bitcoin Cash (BCH): No. While the developers and figures like Roger Ver are seen as entrepreneurial and actively pushing adoption (e.g., in restaurants), the project needs to progress beyond reliance on specific personalities. There's a hard fork coming on November 15th.

* Decentralization vs. Centralized Vision:
* There's a critical discussion on finding the right balance. Extreme decentralization (like Bitcoin) can hinder decision-making and progress, making it difficult to implement changes.
* A more centralized vision, like Vitalik's for Ethereum, can provide a clear roadmap and drive significant, even scary, changes like moving to Proof of Stake.
* Bitcoin's hyper-decentralization is its strength as an unchangeable store of value, while Ethereum is seen as "hyperspeed rails" for innovation.

* The Need for "Hustlers" and Entrepreneurs:
* The crypto space is full of brilliant "techies" focused on protocols, but there's a strong need for "hustlers" – entrepreneurs who can take these technologies and drive real adoption, pushing products into the market.
* The distinction is drawn between legitimate hustlers who build and push products, and the "scammers" who were prevalent in the 2017 ICO boom.
* The long-term outlook remains positive: it's an "absolute no-brainer" that a decentralized currency like Bitcoin (or a derivative/blockchain) will eventually replace fiat money, though the timeline (3-15 years) is uncertain due to the complexity of building the underlying technology.

Transcript

Hey guys and welcome back to Box Mining. This next video is a live stream that was originally broadcast during DEF CON and I really wanted to share with you guys there because there's so much good discussion. So who's in there? It's Omar Crypto. He has the Crypto's news channel and it's absolutely amazing. He has a lot of insights into space and also CNBC's Rand Nooner. And he asks a lot of really good questions and a lot of inputs as to what the future of DEF CON is and what the future of the ...