LayerZero and zkSync Airdrop UPDATE (Sybil Farming DRAMA)

Boxmining avatar Boxmining
15.8K views 297

Description

There's a lot of expectations for the zkSync and LayerZero airdrop. However, both teams have employed strict anti-sybil detection to filter out sybil airdrop farmers. And apparently for LayerZero, thi...

AI Analysis

The crypto world is buzzing with anticipation for the zkSync and LayerZero airdrops, but it's also rife with drama due to intense anti-Sybil farming efforts by both teams. This summary dives into the strict measures being implemented, how they might affect even single-wallet users, and the controversial self-reporting option, offering insights and actionable advice for navigating the complex airdrop landscape.

Here's what you need to know about the latest in LayerZero and zkSync airdrop drama:

* Airdrop Drama Context: There's significant concern and confusion surrounding the strict anti-Sybil measures from zkSync and LayerZero. Many people are worried about being disqualified, especially if they've used tools like Merkley or managed multiple wallets. Getting caught in the crossfire as a genuine user is a major fear.
* zkSync Airdrop "Leak": A leaked document, which seems credible, suggests that 1.5 million wallets have qualified for the zkSync airdrop, with a maximum entitlement of 2,500 ZKS tokens per wallet.
* ZKS Token Price Prediction: Satori's pre-market is trading ZKS at $5, which, given a 1 billion maximum supply (compared to Arbitrum's 10 billion), suggests a higher initial price. A max allocation could net over $12,000.
* zkSync Sybil Hunting: The leaked document mentions a "ZK Sync Sybil hunting methodology" is in place. Since zkSync is an ecosystem partner with LayerZero (who are very public about their anti-Sybil efforts with Nansen and Chaos Labs), this is a legitimate concern for farmers.
* Is the zkSync Snapshot Taken? There's no official confirmation. However, MatterLab's GitHub shows a `snapshot creator` file and a recent commit on `contract verifier` (last week), suggesting they're finalizing decentralization. If you're optimistic, the snapshot might have been taken last week. The mention of a "minus multiplier" for wallets with all transactions within 48 hours implies they're penalizing rush-farming, hinting that a final snapshot for all users hasn't occurred yet, as projects want genuine, consistent users.
* LayerZero Snitching Drama: LayerZero is giving alleged Sybil farmers two choices: self-report to receive 15% of their intended allocation with "no questions asked," or not report and get nothing. They're also encouraging users to "snitch" on others who are Sybil farming, which is not a good look and the presenter strongly dislikes this approach, finding it "way too much."
* What Defines a Sybil for LayerZero: They've explicitly stated that a single entity with "tens, hundreds of thousands of wallets," participating in "industrial farms," minting valueless NFTs just to move them around, bridging one cent back and forth, or using Merkley for these purposes, is "likely a Sybil."
* Are you Disqualified for Using Merkley? It's unlikely you're automatically disqualified. The presenter believes there will be a manual review process focusing on extreme spamming. If you used Merkley for regular Layer3 quests or bridging to networks like Fuse or Celo, it's probably fine. Merkley, as a LayerZero ecosystem partner, is disheartened by being labeled a "Sybil tool."
* Anti-Sybil Detection Methods: Projects use an "ownership graph" to assign a unique user ID based on on-chain behavior. This means they can link multiple wallets to a single entity, even if those wallets don't directly interact. The problem is that a very active, genuine user could be flagged as a spammer.
* Multi-Wallet Farming and Priority: LayerZero's main focus will be on "industrial farming" operations with thousands of wallets, which significantly dilute the reward pool. If you have 2-5 wallets, you're on their "low priority list." If you have over 10 wallets with volumes exceeding $10,000 per wallet, you're on the "high priority list" and at much greater risk of being filtered out.
* Should You Self-Report? The presenter strongly advises against self-reporting, especially with your main wallet. Self-reporting means blacklisting your wallet address, which LayerZero could share with other projects, potentially making you ineligible for future airdrops. There's a "reputation score" that's tracked behind the scenes. Even if you report a secondary wallet, there's a risk they link it back to your main one. The general consensus is, "don't snitch on yourself."
* Source of Fund Tracking: Projects can track fund diffusion (sending funds from one wallet to many others) and sequential diffusion (chaining transactions). Even if you use a KYC'd exchange, there's a possibility of off-the-books communication between projects and exchanges to identify users, which goes against the privacy ideals of Web3.
* Is it Worth it to Sybil Farm Anymore? The presenter personally no longer Sybil farms, finding it too time-consuming and expensive (e.g., setting up a VPS) for uncertain rewards. He recommends diversifying efforts instead. For those still farming, it depends on the scale – small-scale (2-4 wallets) is low risk, large-scale (thousands) is very high risk.
* Sybil Farming on ETH L2s is Harder: Ethereum Layer 2s, especially those using MetaMask, are easier for teams to detect Sybils because Infura (the default RPC provider for MetaMask) collects IP addresses.
* Does VPN Mask Your IP Address? While VPNs help, large projects can still use "browser fingerprinting" (collecting browser configuration data) to work backward and potentially identify your actual IP address. The only way to ensure full privacy is by running your own Ethereum node or independent RPC provider.
* Filtering Sybils is a LOT of Work: Detecting Sybils involves significant manual labor, looking for on-chain behavior patterns. Rapid transactions (e.g., 5-6 transactions within a minute, landing in the same block) are a major red flag for Sybil farmers. Actionable advice: If you're spamming transactions, space them out (10 minutes or even hours apart).
* MetaMask vs. Keplr: Keplr (used in Cosmos-based projects) makes it harder to detect Sybils due to its custom derivation path feature, which doesn't link wallets to a single seed phrase like MetaMask does.
Possible Solution? Instead of harsh penalties or encouraging snitching, the presenter suggests a simpler approach: if a wallet cluster is detected, just allocate a single airdrop to one* of the wallets (perhaps the one with the lowest volume/TVL). This would still prevent industrial farms from monopolizing rewards without resorting to punitive or controversial tactics.
* What if LayerZero is Bluffing?! There's a theory that LayerZero's strong anti-Sybil stance and snitching campaign might be a bluff. Sybil farmers are becoming increasingly sophisticated, even using AI tools like ChatGPT to create farming bots, making detection very difficult. The snitching campaign could be an attempt to cut down on the manual work of identifying these complex operations.
* LayerZero CEO's Hypocrisy: Brian Pellegrino, LayerZero's CEO, is seen as hypocritical for previously wishing he had split his Pudgy Penguins into multiple wallets to maximize a Dimension airdrop, only to then implement such strict anti-Sybil measures for LayerZero. While the presenter understands the challenges faced by the LayerZero team, he reiterates that encouraging a "snitching culture" is terrible PR and bad for business.
* TLDR (Summary of the summary):
* If you used Merkley, don't worry too much; you're on the low priority list.
* The main target is industrial-scale farming (hundreds or thousands of wallets, millions in volume/TVL).
* If you have 2-5 wallets with medium volume, you're on the low priority list.
* If you have hundreds/thousands of wallets with high volume, you're definitely on the high priority list and likely to be filtered out.

* Actionable Takeaways from Q&A:
* Galaxy NFTs: Acquiring Galaxy NFTs is a good habit for potential future airdrops, but LXP (LayerZero Experience Points) is likely the most important for LayerZero.
* "Holy Quadrafacta" for Airdrops: Natively staking Dimension, Saga, Celestia, and Alt Layer tokens is recommended for frequent (though potentially small) airdrops.
* Small Capital Strategy: If you have limited funds, focus on incentivized `perp dexes` (perpetual decentralized exchanges). These reward trading volume, allowing you to compete with whales through skillful trading and leverage (but be very careful with risk management).
* Journal Everything: Keep detailed records of your on-chain transaction costs, not just in USD, but also in the native gas token (e.g., 0.002 ETH for a $2 gas fee), as token prices fluctuate.
* Expectation Management: It's crucial, especially in a bull market where airdrops often get diluted due to high hype. Bear markets can be more profitable for farming as fewer people are engaged.
* DeFi Kingdoms: Using DFK for LayerZero transactions is considered organic and fine, not Sybil behavior, unless you're spamming excessively (e.g., 10 transactions per minute).
* Gitcoin Passport: Likely a factor in zkSync's Sybil hunting methodology, contributing to Web3 credentials.
* Particle Airdrop: You can send 100 transactions, even failed ones count if using USDG as gas. Space them out over time.

In essence, while anti-Sybil measures are necessary to prevent dilution, the aggressive tactics and controversial methods employed by some projects like LayerZero are causing significant backlash from the community, leading to a drop in activity even from genuine users.

Transcript

Welcome to Box Mining. Now we got tons of news about ZK Sync and Layer 0. I'm sure you're already familiar with a lot of the recent events of the project team themselves being very defensive about Sybil farming. Okay, so I know that some of you and probably even a lot of you have questions regarding this and shout out to Llama also on Telegram for waiting to see if I'll do a video about this and this is very much needed. So very important questions to cover in this video. For example, for Layer...